Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez It is absolutely mind-blowing that were are here arguing this at the Supreme Court today. 🙄🤦🏼‍♀️

The assassination of political rivals as an official act.

Understand what the Trump team is arguing for here. Take it seriously and at face value.

This is not a game.

Knowing Donald Trump fears and hates dogs, Kristi Noem revs up her VP campaign by writing about killing her own dog Cricket, a 14 months old wirehair pointer.

theguardian.com/books/2024/apr…

Laurence Tribe 🇺🇦 ⚖️ What can we the people do to show our utter disgust for the corrupt SCOTUS? How do we send a loud and clear message to them,will they hear?

Laurence Tribe 🇺🇦 ⚖️ They are consolidating..

Then Chief Justice Burger, no liberal, wrote in the 5-4 Nixon v Fitzgerald case on which Trump’s lawyers relied in SCOTUS today that no claim of immunity for crimes committed by a former president while in office would “be credible.” He was right.

The justices who were eager to…

To be clear, I still think SCOTUS will issue a considered decision on this case. By which I mean a decision carefully tailored to prevent any possibility of Trump being tried before the election but without limiting Trump's ability to indict and try Joe Biden next year.

This tracks

Elie Mystal 🎯

I so wish somebody would ask Alito this.

JUSTICE KAGAN: What if the president staged a coup—would that be an immune official act?

TRUMP LAWYER:…

WOW: This banger by Sotomayor: 'There is no failsafe system of government, meaning, we have a judicial system that has layers and layers of protection for the accused in the hopes that the innocent will go free. We fail. Routinely. But we succeed more often than not. In the vast…

Good morning, lovelies ❤️ Happy Friday!! Make it a JOY-full day. Spread Joy wherever you go today. You'll be glad you did.

Good Morning My Friends
Your Kindness Can Change Someone Life
Happy Friday Everyone ❤️

Mueller, She Wrote @judgeluttig is making precisely this point as well. Somehow this has turned out to be a broad immunity hearing when that was never argued, other than by the blowhard in himself outside of court.

Mueller, She Wrote They heard what they wanted to hear so they could grant cert.

They ruled there's no immunity IN THIS CASE. That's a far cry from what SCOTUS thinks they decided. And no one brought that up. Here's the appeals court ruling: END/ cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opini…

They said (pp 31): 'We note at the outset that our analysis is specific to the case before us, in which a former President has been indicted on federal criminal charges arising from his alleged conspiracy to overturn federal election results and unlawfully overstay his…

Trump has already taken us back 160 years by overturning Roe v. Wade.

He says this is about states' rights. He’s wrong.

It’s about women’s rights.