CCP’s scientists can easily make up sequences data (e.g. RaTG13, pangolin SARS2-like CoVs) to cheat Americans, while Daszak is a good tool for CCP to deliver false data and misinformation in unrestricted warfare.

2-n) About Dr. Daszak’s performance, his tactics include both blatantly lying and deliberately misleading before congress Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic today.
2. Confusing people in professional way
• When Rep. Tokuda U.S. Rep. Jill Tokuda and other other legislators, counsels ask Daszak whether…

4-n) About Dr. Daszak’s performance, his tactics include both blatantly lying and deliberately misleading before congress Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic today.
4. Daszak’s double standards of “political” impacts on #COVID19 origin
• When Rep. Tokuda U.S. Rep. Jill Tokuda said it’s quite concerning that…

3-n) About Dr. Daszak’s performance, his tactics include both blatantly lying and deliberately misleading before congress Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic today.
3. Daszak fully defends CCP in #COVID19 origin.
• Rep. Lesko Congresswoman Debbie Lesko ask whether Daszak knows CCP’s bioweapon program or WIV’s role…

2-n) About Dr. Daszak’s performance, his tactics include both blatantly lying and deliberately misleading before congress Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic today.
2. Confusing people in professional way
• When Rep. Tokuda U.S. Rep. Jill Tokuda and other other legislators, counsels ask Daszak whether…

I watched the hearing with Dr. Peter Daszak Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic today.
It is an amazing bipartisan effort to pursue the truth of #COVID19 origin and protect Americans! 👍
However, about Dr. Daszak’s performance, his tactics include both blatantly lying and deliberately misleading…

🚨TUNE IN🚨

“A Hearing with the President of EcoHealth Alliance, Dr. Peter Daszak.”

Today at 10:00am ET👇
rumble.com/v4sngx9-hearin…

Monali C. Rahalkar All very plausible - all scenarios.

Since at least 2015 WIV was able to do in-house all the cool chimera work. Because they had been copying Baric Laboratory 's methods via EcoHealth Alliance 's tech transfer, overseen by Dr. Monica M. Bertagnolli NIH Office of Science Policy NIAID Funding

cc: Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic OIG at HHS

One possibility: Shi Zhengli and colleagues finds a unique sequence, RaTG13 or similar. Baric tries to optimise the spike, they have a running grant!! They create a synthetic clone of it either in the US or China. They exchange it for mutual research. WIV uses BSL-2. It leaks!

Baric also explained how they construct the genome in 6 parts, exactly the way sars2 looks like! Yet he said he normally leaves a trace, so what’s that trace, and he can also leave no trace as he explains that can be done!

I have read Baric’s transcribed interview just half way, it’s about 212 pages. What struck me is he said Shi Zhengli had sent him the plasmid on a filter paper back in 2014/15. Qs: did Baric sent any such spike protein to Shi Zhengli in a similar way? Remember: partners NIHgrant

The above description looks absolutely suspicious! SARS-2 has a S2 exactly like RaTg13 (the so called 293 virus?), RBD like pangolins. If he can make such strange combos in 2012, who stopped him in 2019? Additionally since 2019 Baric had access to WIV sequences?

Regarding the 293: here is what Baric says! That the number 3 might be an error and it could be 96? Look at this: Triple chimera with SARS1 like RBD, S2 from '293' bat virus and HKU3 NTD!! Backbone taken in 2012!

The above possibility is shared because, in the RaTg13 metagenome, there are very less bacteria, major reads are bad, the viral reads are very good and almost a complete viral genome can be assembled. Qs. is, could Baric have helped in such a thing? Read above explanation by him.

What if they had a close progenitor eg. the original sequence of 4991 of which they made a full length clone? As the pandemic broke out, it would show a very high % similarity to SARS-2. Hence, if a clone with 96.2% similarity was built, and mixed with some bat tissue, etc.

Remember that the sequence of RaTG13 was deposited late, and the metagenome deposited on 13th Feb 2020, giving ample time for any such manipulation, if any.

Now the question is, did Baric or Shi in some way would make RaTG13 go farther, eg. 96.2% so that no-one suspected that the SARS-2 was made from 4991. This doubt still remains. Because, the metagenome of RaTg13 has many anomalies. RaTg13 in that metagenome could be a clone.

There is an email by Zhengli Shi to Baric, and she comments that Baric should not talk about a possibility of a virus closer than RaTg13:

Dr Steven Quay RaTG13 sequence (original 4991) could have been modified and shown to us.

And they might have used the original sequence for building synthetic sars2. As no sequence (published) lies in that clade. Aim3 of RO1 discussed building high risk strains!

Here I compare SARS2 with RaTG13 and show that it is highly improbably that there is a random, restriction site extinguishing SNV in all seven RaTG13 restriction sites, given the genomes are 96% identical overall.

ALL of them, by the way, obey the 'No See 'Em' rule of being a…