Paul Nary (@profpaulnary) 's Twitter Profile
Paul Nary

@profpaulnary

Strategy professor @Wharton | Evidence-based M&A, corporate strategy, private equity, and shareholder activism. Occasionally grumpy, always constructive.

ID: 570190623

linkhttp://www.paulnary.com calendar_today03-05-2012 16:37:09

2,2K Tweet

2,2K Takipçi

565 Takip Edilen

Paul Nary (@profpaulnary) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Nothing like coming back from a long vacation and jumping right back into action. Just a few hundred emails to sort through, a handful of overdue research projects, a couple of interviews, and a few meetings today. Let's go!

Paul Nary (@profpaulnary) 's Twitter Profile Photo

The cycle repeats all over. Yet again, the "magic" of putting together content and distribution fizzles out, failing to produce the desired results. Happened in the past, happening today, will happen again tomorrow. Billions of dollars of shareholder value wasted.

Paul Nary (@profpaulnary) 's Twitter Profile Photo

The question that I have is whether we are talking about almost $100M spent on a) terrible advice, b) good advice that was not followed, or c) McKinsey's stamp of approval on $WBD managers' own bad strategy.

Paul Nary (@profpaulnary) 's Twitter Profile Photo

It is worth studying PE deals that were early experiments with new business types and deal structures A similar success story of an experimental deal was Silver Lake's buyout of Seagate in the early 2000s, which also confirmed that the PE model can work well in high-tech space.

Paul Nary (@profpaulnary) 's Twitter Profile Photo

There is plenty of research that shows that outsourcing critical capabilities, or externalizing when transaction costs are high, leads to poor outcomes. But not all resources and capabilities are critical. I think the key here, just like with individual firms, is figuring out:

Paul Nary (@profpaulnary) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Talking to some industry contacts over the last couple weeks and it seems like there should be a significant bump in M&A activity soon.. yet, of course, this is largely anecdotal so far.

Paul Nary (@profpaulnary) 's Twitter Profile Photo

A legendary deal for Silver Lake. More importantly, Seagate buyout confirmed that the PE model could work well for tech assets. But given its size and visibility, it attracted competition. By the mid 2000s multiple PE firms were targeting similar high-tech transactions.

Paul Nary (@profpaulnary) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Finally, some fun M&A developments with a potential bidding war brewing for GMS Interesting move for $HD from a corporate strategy perspective as it looks to continue its aggressive expansion into the pro segment following the $18B acquisition of SRS Distribution last year.

Paul Nary (@profpaulnary) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Home Depot's M&A activity over the last decade: Only a few big deals: -SRS in 2024 ($18B) - roofing -HD Supply repurchase in 2020 ($8.7B) - electrical, plumbing, etc. -Interline Brands in 2015 ($1.7B) - maintenance/repair for CRE Smaller deals: -IDG/Construction Resources in

Paul Nary (@profpaulnary) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Interesting post on some potential current structural issues for the PE industry. Do GPs generally tend to agree with this assessment? I am also curious to know if this trend is similar across PE investments by size and industry, or if there is variance there.