I wrote about the implications of the Cass Report for US debates: “If you still think that concerns about child medical transition are nothing more than a moral panic, then I have a question: What evidence would change your mind?”

Here’s a gift link:

theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…

Judith Butler really is the dim person’s idea of a very clever person

This is so grim. Genuinely depressing. They actively want to suppress work done on giving kids the best medical care. I just can't imagine.

ie this was Pink News a couple of years ago - declaring these drugs safe without even a basic level of scientific evidence.

Some male pundits seem to think when Hilary Cass cited toxicity of debate she really meant women not being gentle enough in pointing out how ill-informed they are, rather than death threats and ruined careers for whistleblowers & feminist campaigners. What luxury ignorant bliss!

CAMILLE PAGLIA STAN ✨ FAN ACCOUNT

The older I get, the more I have to guard myself from being dismissive of these types of conversations.

I don't need a scientific study to know that transitioning kids is wrong.

But why do they need a scientific study?

The reason is that, in the last decade or so, our society…

‘There are stories starting to come out about it from a lot of transphobic outlets uh, specifically the New York Times…’

This is the medical industry’s version of money-laundering

JFC

This is how you manufacture consent. A handful of activist professionals and professional activists create a series of circular citations of each other's papers and guidelines to create an illusion of scientific method and consensus.

It doesn't have to be done well; it was done…

Excellent point Miss Triggs. Perhaps one of the people we haven’t traduced as a TERF would like to make it.

#CassReview