In the future, when the times comes for DeFiLlama to generate revenue, what would be your preferred method to do so:

DefiLlama.com A fee on LlamaSwap seems to be the most 'crypto-native' strategy for generating revenues

@kharlo_199 DefiLlama.com it's also one of the most fragile though... although probably could be a very very small fee and still be more profitable than all the others

0xGeeGee @kharlo_199 DefiLlama.com imo you're capturing so much user attention by it remaining free to access - once you are using the llama swap aggr you never leave (in my experience) so the convenience for new users to get in w/o paywall and accept a small fee is v reasonable.

To your point small=better

Kreagan // @kharlo_199 DefiLlama.com oh i think llamaswap would stay out of the paywall anyway? but yeah agree.

0xGeeGee Kreagan // DefiLlama.com This was also my understanding. But idk if there are so much ppl that would pay for a membership for CSV exports - also when there will be new data providers without paywall

@kharlo_199 Kreagan // DefiLlama.com i think also integrating referrals everywhere would be really not much intrusive and potentially lucrative.
0xngmi can you guys share any estimate of the amount needed? or maybe it's better not to

@0xLlam4 @kharlo_199 Kreagan // DefiLlama.com 0xngmi A 0.01/2% fee on llamaswap would probably do the trick right?

0xGeeGee @0xLlam4 @kharlo_199 Kreagan // 0xngmi It would, yes. Something like 0.01% on stables and 0.02% non stables would work.

DefiLlama.com 0xGeeGee @0xLlam4 @kharlo_199 Kreagan // 0xngmi 0.01-0.02% fee is very reasonable considering metamask charges 0.875% & still ranking 13th in top 50 gas guzzlers.