Proponents of unchecked global warming seem unable to grasp that the UK's net gas imports would have been 20% higher in 2023 without onshore wind (and 50% higher without wind power overall)

David Frost This is total bollocks. Why do you climate change deniers persist in alarmism about renewables? What do you have against free unlimited fuel? Have you heard of storage?

Fracking means increasing CO2 emissions? You do know that this causes warming? Or do you deny basic physics?

This is pure bollocks from a man who has proven that his ignorance is exceeded only by his incredible arrogance.

Today's report from Resolution Foundation on what happens to the net zero transition if interest rates remain high is fascinating, and much more nuanced than some of the headlines this morning. businessgreen.com/news-analysis/… BG+

David McNab @[email protected] "MAKING MONEY REAL"-BJ_Chippindale (author) ☮️ Matthew Syed He also thinks that we can’t afford to act on climate change. He’s not even a climate change denier. It just doesn’t seem to occur to him that without a visible environment there’s no economy. And that migration might be a direct result of climate change.

When you share detailed analysis on why a myth is false and people just repeat the same myth back to you.

So many comments from people who never bothered to read the article I linked to.

Saul Staniforth for info x.com/TheDisproof/st…

The cost of climate action may seem high, but the cost of inaction is much higher.

As the latest 2023 European State of the Climate shows, we must leverage science to provide solutions for the good of society.

Check out the full report: wmo.int/publication-se…

The biggest obstacle to climate action is the fossil fuel industry. The second biggest are the Serious People who accept climate science but say it's unrealistic to cut emissions at the pace experts say is needed.

Why we should beware of the 'grown-ups': ft.com/content/07dae7…

How can #bbclaurak do a special on #netzero without bothering to research the basics and then totally failing to call out disinformation? A quick 🧵rebutting some of the worst of it....
bbc.co.uk/programmes/m00…

Chris Martz I eagerly await the day when you publish your arguments and evidence for the scrutiny of climate scientists. They are the ones YOU have to convince. Not your followers. Demanding you do that is not an “appeal to authority” nor “mooching” off you.