Carol Wade
@carolsuewade
ID:21286400
19-02-2009 09:43:23
209,5K Tweets
2,1K Followers
5,0K Following
Desperately sad to see the Rwanda Bill pass through its final stages tonight.
As Iโve been saying for months (see ๐), itโs immoral, unworkable, and eye-wateringly expensive.
Above all, itโs just designed to save Sunakโs skin.
#RwandaBill
Braverman said twice on BBC Radio 4 Today that the British public had repeatedly voted for the Rwanda policy. When was that then? Tories have been spectacularly battered in 20 by-elections since Hartlepool and Rwanda wasnโt in the 2019 manifesto.
'A development company that sells off land no longer needed by Thames Water has paid out a ยฃ14m dividend despite warnings'.
Yep despite now demanding bill payers bailout the failing WC Thames Water ๐ง and or their owners are still trying to pickpocket you.
theguardian.com/business/2024/โฆ
Aspire66๐ฌ๐ง๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ Otto English It has been proven to be unsafe. We have accepted refugees from Rwanda in the last few months so we agree it is unsafe. You cannot legislate that away. If it was safe it wouldn't be a deterrent and would do nothing to stop the boats anyway. The costs are very poor value.
Aspire66๐ฌ๐ง๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ Otto English You do know the agreement is reciprocal.
While we can send only 200 unwanted UK asylum seekers there, Rwanda can send their most problematic failed asylum seekers to us in return.
PS cost is c.ยฃ500m for 200.
Farrukh Lord Sharpe was so unnecessarily rude to Natalie Bennett after that.
Commenting on the absence of Jenny Jones and his subsequent derogatory comments about Baroness Bennett remaining in the chamber. He may have a title but he lacks class.
Nick O'Donnell Imagine heading for bed after achieving a piece of legislation like the Rwanda plan that isn't even going to stave off electoral oblivion. I know these people didn't get into politics for benevolent reasons, but you'd think, in some remote part of their conscience, they might