Psifour(@Psifour) 's Twitter Profileg
Psifour

@Psifour

Cypherpunk
(Developer and Tech./Dev. Advocate)

ID:555891325

calendar_today17-04-2012 11:27:42

1,7K Tweets

5,0K Followers

282 Following

_Checkɱate 🔑⚡🌋☢️🛢️(@_Checkmatey_) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Alex Thorn Inscriptions have been a fantastic test of the system:

- They indeed are an unintended workaround within the tech.
- Stress test of fee markets leading to innovation for L2s.
- By and large minimal impact on network stability and data footprint.
- Created incentive for…

account_circle
Jameson Lopp(@lopp) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Technology is like an onion.

It's layers upon layers upon layers.

And every time you peel back a layer to see what's underneath, it makes you cry.

account_circle
Eric Wall | BIP-2023-50428(@ercwl) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Casey is absolutely right here. JPEGs & BRC-20-like stuff cannot alone solve the security budget issue since they are too spikey in nature. However, the unlocked arbitrary blobspace of Bitcoin allows for a plethora of meta-protocols to co-exist and harmonize demand spikes.

account_circle
Psifour(@Psifour) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Weird, Luke's PR to patch this 'terrible bug' has almost universal rejection by the developers within the community.

He posted a CVE, but the only references on there that support this being a bug are the ones he can fabricate (see being a content admin on the referenced wiki).

account_circle
Psifour(@Psifour) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Rejecting a donation to avoid even the *perception* of inpropriety is such a good look. Doing so while explaining why it would be optimal to have a shallower/wider base of support is even better. Doing so while still thanking the project for the intent is *chef's kiss*.

account_circle
Samourai Wallet(@SamouraiWallet) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Luke runs a fork of Core called Knots, in his fork he has defined the OP_RETURN limit at 42 bytes. He is more than entitled to do this.

However to claim Whirlpool transactions are non standard because they do not conform to the values of his niche fork is totally wrong and a lie

account_circle
Samourai Wallet(@SamouraiWallet) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Luke is claiming that Whirlpool transactions are 'bugged' and create non standard transactions due to a 46 byte OP_RETURN present in Whirlpool Tx0 transactions.

This is a lie. He knows it is a lie. The OP_RETURN limit has been 80 bytes since Bitcoin Core version 0.12

Luke is claiming that Whirlpool transactions are 'bugged' and create non standard transactions due to a 46 byte OP_RETURN present in Whirlpool Tx0 transactions. This is a lie. He knows it is a lie. The OP_RETURN limit has been 80 bytes since Bitcoin Core version 0.12
account_circle
Post Capone(@p0stc4p0n3) 's Twitter Profile Photo

'If we ban 'useless data' then it would be easy for would-be data storers to instead embed their data inside 'useful' data such as dummy sigs or pubkeys'

account_circle
Psifour(@Psifour) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Congratulations to OCEAN for finding their FIRST block! While I may disagree with their specific stances, I am always glad to see a new pool hit a block.

Can we get the counter from Eligius reset to be accurate for Ocean?

account_circle
Seth For Privacy(@sethforprivacy) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Fun fact: you can both be anti-censorship of all types in Bitcoin and dislike the entire Ordinals/Inscriptions scene.

It's not either or.

Would I prefer my on-chain TXs not be crazy expensive because of jpegs and rare sats? Of course.

Do I think any central party (i.e. a…

account_circle
checksum0(@checksum0) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Doing spot check of high paying transactions, I have seen no transactions including any data after op_false. I highly suspect they are running Luke Dashjr Bitcoin Knots with the heavy censorship set incorporated in it.

Mining with OCEAN WILL cost you money.

account_circle