🚨Sessions for our free online 'Exploring Law Course: Studying Law at University' course start on Monday - there's still time to sign up to participate! 🚨

Calling all prospective Uni students interested in learning about law degrees, or the exciting and varied career paths available to law grads. We're hosting the 'Exploring Legal Futures' webinar programme on 12 & 13 Feb - check out the details & register: law.cam.ac.uk/press/news/202…

Following the debate on the Rwanda treaty this afternoon, Peers have now voted in favour of Lord Goldsmiths’s motion (214-171). In my view, they have sprung a clever trap on the Government…

This is a very helpful thread.

Following the announcement of the retirement of Eyal Benvenisti (@Lauterpacht_Ctr) we are seeking applicants for the prestigious Whewell Professorship: the applicant must have an outstanding track-record as a scholar and teacher of Public International Law: law.cam.ac.uk/press/jobs/202…

What exquisite timing.

For those propounding the view that there can be no separation of powers in the UK because a) we don't have strong-form judicial review of legislation and b) we're a parliamentary, not a Presidential system I'd really recommend..

I think these claims in the Report are both irresponsible & contrary to good academic practice in misrepresenting what Mark and others have said, to help try and discredit their arguments. Our first duty to our intellectual opponents is to present their positions fairly.

A thread in which I defend myself against Policy Exchange's claim that I am being 'wildly irresponsible' by inviting the courts to 'overthrow' parliamentary sovereignty. (TL;DR: I'm not, and I've done no such thing.)

I just spoke to Kait Borsay on Times Radio about what comes next for the Rwanda Bill.

The truth is it’s hard to see how the PM can square the circle in his own party, let alone pilot the Bill through Parliament. /1