🔥Telegram İfşa

No babies. Babies are infants, infants are born. Thank you rape supporter, for denying my denial of consent. If it’s not inside of YOUR BODY, it’s not YOUR call on whether or not it’s violating the person it IS inside of.

Mmmhmmm. Abortion IS self defense precious. Pregnancy is harmful to us. Sweetie? You just admitted we don’t force anyone else to violate their bodily autonomy to keep another alive. The “removal” is not the issue. The violation of bodily autonomy to keep another alive is.

Sweetie? Tell me now. Do embryos have DNA? Yes or no?

No. That would be “unborn.” Premade meals are made in advance. Not yet made meals, would be “unmade.” You use this word game to imply birth is inevitable, that there is no choice. This is incorrect.

Before birth. Birth is a noun, so you can be before birth. BORN is an adjective, not a noun. You can’t be BEFORE an adjective, you just are not.

Darling child, do even know what a colloquialism is? A word in common, but incorrect usage. INCORRECT. We are not using feelings or slang in this conversation. This is science time. Facts time.

Some emotional people incorrectly call a fetus a term of endearment. They are scientifically incorrect. Your emotions do not have any sway over pregnancies not occurring in your body. And more to the point: Do not lie, you say it to conflate it with a newborn.

Yes you do. Rape by instrumentation and the instrument is the unwanted fetus. Explain what else you call forcing someone to keep something inside of their genitals against their will.

Nope! Thats rapist talk. A woman can consent only to the penis, not the sperm. She can even deny consent to PIV sex entirely. I know as a Catholic you think missionary is the only way, it’s not.

Ok. Let’s prove that. Would you allow me to remove an unwanted embryo from my body, assuming you had the power to stop me?

No darling, no squirming or dodging. You HAVE the full legal power to stop me from removing the embryo. Do you?

No precious. Murder by its very definition is ILLEGAL killing. Despite your opinions and feelings, abortion is not murder. Define in your own words “oxymoron.” As for your false analogy, when were the Jews inside of Hitler’s body?

You already admitted this is a lie. You already admitted embryos have DNA, so abortion covers up nothing. And besides, DNA does NOT prove rape. It only proves sex. The consensuality of it, is not proven either way.

It is a thing you force me to keep inside of my genitals against my will. These are the objective facts, your sentimental attachment to the fetus changes nothing. If you disagree with this assessment, your only choice is to allow me to remove it with no whining.

Nope! It proves who the sex partner was. It does not prove the sex wasn’t consensual. It will STILL be a “he said, she said” thing.

Now name the exceptions listed in the 5th or 14th amendments based on immigration status, or admit there are none. I’m making it so easy for you to prove your claims that due process is only for citizens. By the way? Seeking Asylum is a right based on international treaties.

Yes. You. Are. And by the way, princess? Neither the 5th nor the 14th say they only apply to criminal cases. Even in civil cases, innocent until proven guilty applies. The ONLY difference is the “beyond a shadow of a doubt” standard is not applied.

False dichotomy fallacy alert! Third options detected. Only two options in unwanted pregnancies: keep or abort. Learn what makes a good analogy and try again.

You didn’t answer anything, bot. Do you know that books exist? That people talk about pregnancy? It’s not some magical secret only those who have gotten pregnant can know. Not that I’m saying I’ve never been pregnant, because it is NOYDB.

No it doesn’t precious. I told the only parts that matter. He did not intend to violate her. She still said no and wants him to stop. If the man is EQUALLY HUMAN to a fetus, does his “lack of intent to violate” override her denial of consent and must she allow it to go on?