'97Percent promotes pragmatic gun-policy reforms — with a twist: Their principal goal is to engage gun owners in the conversation.' Check out our profile in The Washington Post Magazine. washingtonpost.com/magazine/2022/…

97Percent The Washington Post Magazine Since you say you also represent gun owners, can you name a couple of state or federal gun laws that go too far and you believe should be struck down?

97Percent The Washington Post Magazine I get that you are for UBCs and stuff. But given you say you are going for balance in your leadership, surely SOME gun control laws go too far for you.

E.g., do you think New York's new carry law is acceptable? It makes basically everywhere off limits for the right to carry.

97Percent The Washington Post Magazine Or how about the California 'Unsafe Handgun Roster', which has effectively banned the sale of semiautomatic pistols released after 2013 by requiring a technology (microstamping) that doesn't exist? Is that OK to you?

If you oppose either of these laws publicly, I will take you

97Percent The Washington Post Magazine seriously as an organization even if I disagree with most of your stances. If you can't bring yourself to oppose even blatantly unconstitutional laws like these, then you are yet another anti-gun group pretending to be moderate.

Hell, if you don't want to oppose the examples

97Percent The Washington Post Magazine above, name a couple that you do oppose that you can think of.

Thanks!

97Percent The Washington Post Magazine Saw that your executive summary says you will be clear on what you do and don't support.

That's all I'm asking for here - some clarity on what existing gun laws you don't support.