truthwondereroftheworld Scott Adams The world is warming some generally as it has been for 10,000 years, otherwise Chicago would be under a mile of ice. CO2 being a relevant factor is the issue. Politicians claim a mosquito (CO2) landed on an elephant (GHGs and other variables) and this is causing the scales to tip

jay kronak Scott Adams Except temperatures are climbing faster than ever recorded.

I’m not worried what politicians claim, I’m focused on the overwhelming scientific research showing humans as the major factor in our warming

truthwondereroftheworld Scott Adams Scientists who alter temperature records for profit are no longer scientists, they're politicians. That's why I use unalterable facts like temp records. I will post a few graphs from NASA showing altered temp records to maintain the narrative. How could record cold be happening?

jay kronak Scott Adams Sure, post the proof, heard this BS before. It all comes down to a change in how it’s collected and making sure you compare apples to apples. And we know the data is accurate because NASA isn’t the only game in town, and other records match. The same temp increase rates

truthwondereroftheworld Scott Adams Here you go. Tune in a 2 minute mark if you don't have 2 minutes to spare. youtube.com/watch?v=163GEl… Recently they've done the same with sea level. A few years ago I'd use their graphs to show constant, stable rise. Now their graphs can look like the rise is accelerating.

jay kronak Scott Adams Except they didn’t change it 10 years later to@fit an agenda, they opted to change it that year, and got the go ahead in 2001. They explain the reasoning in several papers, as I mentioned earlier.

pubs.giss.nasa.gov/abs/ha02300a.h…

truthwondereroftheworld Scott Adams There was most definitely a global warming agenda in 2001. These adjustments were made to fit it. This is what they do. You've heard of climategate right? forbes.com/sites/jamestay… Sea level rise is toughest to fake. That will finally end the scam one day. tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltre…

jay kronak Scott Adams Also, the adjustments were being made as far back as 1999

truthwondereroftheworld Scott Adams I remember this well, I was afraid. youtube.com/watch?v=7tAYXQ…
Those hollywood types. Sooo reliable lmao. I suppose you believe the 97% consensus. That was the biggest piece of effective bs there was. Blatant lie. I was in shock at the audacity.

jay kronak Scott Adams Do you have something debunking the Cook meta analysis? It looked at about 12000 studies, 4000 of those weighed in on if the authors believed climate change was caused by human activity, and 97.1 of the 4000 said yes. That’s where 97.1 comes from

truthwondereroftheworld jay kronak Scott Adams Surprising verifiable facts about climate change & the 97% or 99.9% scientific consensus about it.
bit.ly/LindP
bit.ly/CPP38
bit.ly/HCP38a