profile-img
Austin

@Persuasion1099

calendar_today18-06-2018 22:21:10

27 Tweets

776 Followers

25 Following

Austin(@Persuasion1099) 's Twitter Profile Photo

@Cristian7862 @topntran The difference between WWI and now is that everyone back then (in terms of the rulers of affected countries) wanted the war. They were eager to show off their latest military innovations. There hasn't been a hunger for world war since the atom bombs were made. It's too costly.

account_circle
Austin(@Persuasion1099) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Leona @Cristian7862 @topntran WHAAAAAT? Homie, you do realize war is good for economy right? And great for the leaders pockets? Usually after wars, the country takes ten steps. Leaders love this because they are about to get PAID

account_circle
Austin(@Persuasion1099) 's Twitter Profile Photo

KillGrayson @Cristian7862 @topntran Sure, against countries like Iraq who- importantly- don't have nuclear capabilities, that is very much the case. As sad as it is for Ukraine, the US/NATO isn't going to go to bat for them to the scale of full armed conflict with Russia.

account_circle
Austin(@Persuasion1099) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Leona @Cristian7862 @topntran Oh I agree, but it’s good for Russia. Approval ratings in Russia have dropped hella because economy so as terrible as it is, if they get ukraine back they will probably boost economy

account_circle
Austin(@Persuasion1099) 's Twitter Profile Photo

KillGrayson Leona @Cristian7862 @topntran If 1 nuclear weapon goes off, the economy doesn't exist anymore

Because it won't just end at 1 being fired

account_circle